Monday, March 21, 2011

Bills aim to protect fishing permits from creditors

Below is a joint press release from Alaska's congressional delegation.

The legislation was filed as S. 608 in the Senate and H.R. 1210 in the House.

March 18, 2011

Alaska delegation introduces Maritime Lien Reform Act

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Alaska delegation on Thursday introduced the Maritime Lien Reform Act of 2011.

The legislation would protect fishermen who hold Alaska commercial fishing permits.

The legislation also would prohibit maritime liens from being imposed on permits and protect the right of fishermen to continue to earn a livelihood by engaging in commercial fishing. Similar legislation was introduced in 2006 and 2008 but neither bill became law.

"The legislation is imperative to protect all fishermen's ability to continue to make a living and provide income for their families and to meet their debts," Sen. Lisa Murkowski said. "It will keep fishermen on the water employed with the one asset in which they can keep earning a living and address their creditors."

"Commercial fishing is the backbone of the economy in Alaska's coastal communities and an individual's fishing permit needs to be protected," Sen. Mark Begich said. "This bill will prevent fishermen from having a lien slapped on their ability to fish, and allow them to work through problems they may have. It will help keep permits in local communities and keep fishermen working."

"Commercial fishing is one of the largest industries in our state and a valuable commodity not only to Alaska but to the country," Rep. Don Young said. "This bill protects fishermen's ability to make a profit and pay off their debts without taking away their prime source of income. Debts cannot be paid off if there are no earnings, so this legislation is a win-win for fishermen, creditors and Alaska."

Alaska law already prohibits liens on Alaska limited entry permits, but a court decision threw that into doubt by determining that a fishing license was subject to a maritime lien under federal admiralty law. The decision has become the rationale for attempts to take Alaska fishing permits in federal bankruptcy court and the legislation is the best way to protect these permits and fishermen.

The legislation would not only benefit Alaskan residents. There are over 13,000 individuals who hold Alaska commercial entry permits. While approximately 75 percent of the permits are held by Alaska residents, permit holders live in all 50 states.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

If a permit holder is forced to sell because he made bad business decisions and over-leveraged themselves. It could make way for someone to buy in that may be able to do it better.

Anonymous said...

If a lender can't seek security for indebtedness by using a permit for collateral, it really makes it hard for anyone to borrow funds to get a permit.

Anonymous said...

They should let truckers keep their trucks. Carpenters keep their saws. Bankers keep their banks.

Anonymous said...

Property or Privy Council?

The real question, in relation to the purchase, loan, and an IRS lien too?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Privilege

The priviledge is abolished, after the 1st sale, becoming property purchased with money, like all the other property in the world.

Life Liberty and Property...in all states of the Union. U.S. Grant(R), for confused democrats Lisa Murkowski, and Ted Stevens included.