Wednesday, November 21, 2012

Pollock pointing up

We could well see an increase in the catch limit for Bering Sea pollock next season.

Pollock is the largest U.S. fishery by volume — the feedstock for making zillions of kid-pleasing fish sticks, not to mention that oh-so-versatile protein paste known as surimi.

For the 2013 season, scientists are recommending an "acceptable biological catch" of 1,375,000 metric tons.

That's a nearly 13 percent increase over the 2012 ABC of 1,220,000 tons.

The North Pacific Fishery Management Council will adopt a harvest limit at its Dec. 3-11 meeting in Anchorage.

19 comments:

Anonymous said...

That's just nuts

Anonymous said...

remember the grand banks,how plentifull the cod were!untill the total collapce of the fisherie from over fishing!it's only a matter of time for this fisherie!greed will always blind we will never learn from our past mistakes!!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

More fishing time = more bycatch..............science is a joke

Anonymous said...

After this past B-season? Unbelievable...they must have a magic wand or a pollock whistle. We need a reduction, not an increase.

Anonymous said...

I agree science is a joke, Same with the people saying it is okay to increase the limit. Greed leads to more greed. The people pushing for more aren't effected by the bycatch. This sucks!

Anonymous said...

The Council doesn't have to raise the catch limit just because the ABC changed. They can decide to leave it where it is or even lower it.

Anonymous said...

How stupid can they get! My gawd, somebody needs to seriously look at these guys.

Anonymous said...

We should manage the pollock fishery based on how people "feel". Science has no business in the decision making process!

Anonymous said...

yeah a lot of science went into destroying the grand banks cod fisherie too!they also used a lot of science in wrecking the bearing sea red king crab fisherie in the past!!!!!yeahh we don't want no common sence ideas involved!!!!!!give me a break this is a cave in to special interists from washington state!!!!!!people should start boycotting any business that sells any fish sticks or any products fom this fisherie!

Anonymous said...

Let's base quotas on emotions. Salmon crashes happened in the past even before the pollock fishing began. It's overfishing by the users of the salmon either through subsistence or commercial or both. Get a grip people.

Anonymous said...

I 2nd that emotion,

"Pollock Provides"

Anonymous said...

Greed, as all, provides. At least until the fish are all gone.

Anonymous said...

leaving the management of the pollock or the P cod fisheries up to the NPFMC is like leaving the foxes in charge of the chicken house. Except for a couple of cases one must have a conflict of interest to serve on the Council. They almost all are affected by their own decisions. They each should be required to read "Cod' and the "King of Fish" and be given a test on the moral of each book. Trusting the Council to do the right thing is like trusting a used car salesman. Hard to do.

Anonymous said...

Put federal observers on salmon commercial fishing boats. And on pollock boats. And have them travel with sports fishermen.

Anonymous said...

Pollock Destroys.

Anonymous said...

People and their dependance on natural resources are all connected. It's crazy to allow pollock fishers to continue to fish in the salmons nursery, killing them off as bycatch,while leaving the aboriginal people of Western Alaska on the banks of Alaska's rivers with dry nets and empty fish racks. Killing off a culture and tradition of Alaskas First Peoples is what it amounts to.

Anonymous said...

Ya'll better get used to it. Big wins -always. Only if things get bad enough and I mean really bad, perhaps, the ESA will play in. Otherwise, those effected are screwed. Fishsticks trump all else.

Anonymous said...

Fishdicks...

Anonymous said...

It's unethical that "Big wins - always." primarily because their winning tactics usually includes manipulation, bullying and propaganda. Anti-trust tactics is what it amounts to.